Together with the other portfolios from across the University, it was input for a first iteration in an iterative process which resulted in a university strategic plan. Following the approval by the Board of Control in May 2000 , each unit will create an implementation plan with quantitative metrics, targets, and time lines. These implementation plans become the basis for the operating budgets assigned to the units. Each year, the university strategic plan, the units' strategic plans, and the resulting operating budgets will go through this iterative cycle of assessment, revision, and budget allocation.
This first iteration for 2000-2001 represents
Max Seel, Dean
Summer 2000
1. MISSION AND VISION
1.1. Mission
We prepare students to create the future.
The College of Sciences and Arts provides the foundation, the fundamental principles, and the areas of creativity and enrichment which are at the core of all university learning. The College educates undergraduate and graduate students to have a global perspective and prepares them to reach their full potential in a technologically rich and ethnically diverse society.
1.2 Vision
Michigan Tech will be a national university of choice.
The College of Sciences and Arts will be a college with exciting programs, scholarship, and research in the science and technology niche. It will be an integral part of a university which is ranked in the top research tier by the Carnegie foundation. The success of our students will always be the most important measure. To that end, faculty and students will learn together in nationally prominent undergraduate and graduate programs which blend teaching, research, and scholarship; anticipate critical emerging directions; and cross the disciplinary boundaries.
1.3 Key Features
In order to accomplish our vision, we need a plan that is informed by the following general, overarching themes:
@ Science and Technology
This century is characterized by the rapid translation of science into technology and by the almost instant practical application of a new discovery. Michigan Tech will be successful if it can transform its traditional narrow technological core competency into a science and technology competency. New high demand areas are in communications, computing and information technology, biotechnology, smart materials, environment and resource sustainability reflected by fast-growth industries in e-commerce, internet, web applications, micro- and nano-technology, industrial ecology and sustainability.
@ Unique Characteristics
Our programs and scholarship will be noted for their disciplinary and interdisciplinary strength. That is, we desire to move into cutting edge interdisciplinary relationships across the College and the University through our "Sci/Tech Plus" initiative (see below under strategy 1.3.1). At the same time, we recognize that strong interdisciplinary programs are contingent upon strong disciplinary foundations.
@ Carnegie I
Michigan Tech is at the threshold of moving from a regional university to that of a Research I university. Since reputation is based on scholarship and research, we will become a university of choice in science and technology only if this transition is achieved. Therefore, the College of Sciences and Arts supports this goal as being fundamental to the overall strategy.
@Success of our Students
The Carnegie I goal is mutually consistent with high-quality undergraduate education. Scholarship and education are inextricably linked. Knowledge is key. The education of leaders requires faculty who are leaders. The education of students to be innovative demands faculty who are innovative in teaching and research. The education of students to unleash their creativity needs faculty who are creative.
@ Internet
Our strategic plan needs to take into account the impact of the internet, web-based instruction, and for-profit education. The College must provide an education that prepares students for an internet-based economy and a networked world as well as for social interaction. The College needs to address where it sees its competitive niche in an environment where the e-commerce market tries to segregate "knowledge delivery", "knowledge creation", and the "social aspects" of a traditional college education.
@ Globalization and Diversity.
The explosion in global electronic communication and the removal of political obstacles for collaborative research and education has impacted every department in the College of Sciences and Arts. Modern research groups are truly global. We need to take advantage and incorporate this into a meaningful experience for our undergraduates: global interconnectedness of markets and economies demand educated persons who can function in a global and diverse environment.
@ Art: A Counterpoint to the Science and Technology Focus
Science and technology are not value-free. In an environment focused on science and technology, the College's programs in the arts -- for education, participation, and enrichment -- provide opportunities to nurture high values. "For art establishes the basic human truths which must serve as the touchstones of our judgement" (J.F. Kennedy).
2. CURRENT CONTEXT
2.1 CURRENT STATUS
Profile:
Sci&Arts majors = 21 % of total student body.
Overall College ratio between undergraduate/graduate: 84/16.
| Department | UG | MS | PhD | Faculty (t-t)*) | Staff | General Fund (1999-2000) (in 1000) | Research Expenditures (FY99, in 1000) | SCH All Faculty (1997-98) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biology | 231 | 14 | 21 | 13 | 6.5 | 1,122 | 1,066 | 8,384 |
| Clinical Lab Sciences | 44 | |||||||
| Chemistry | 56 | 8 | 25 | 18 | 12 | 1,578 | 314 | 20,478 |
| Computer Science | 422 | 37 | **) | 12 | 2 | 973 | 416 | 9,876 |
| General Studies | 6 | |||||||
| Education | 3 | 1 | 273 | 3,068 | ||||
| Fine Arts | 9 | 4 | 553 | 3,876 | ||||
| Humanities | 133 | 17 | 35 | 30 | 7.75 | 1,937 | 10 | 23,406 |
| Mathematics | 67 | 8 | 11 | 28 | 3 | 2,091 | 103 | 35,355 |
| Physical Education | 1 | 3 | 249 | 5,599 | ||||
| Physics | 56 | 1 | 22 | 19 | 7 | 1,383 | 1,063 | 12,919 |
| Social Sciences | 41 | 18 | 17 | 4.25 | 1,025 | 116 | 14,539 | |
| Undeclared | 71 | |||||||
| NonDegree Seeking | 134 | |||||||
| College Total | 1,261 | 103 | 114 | 150 | 50.5 | 11,183 | 3,088 | 138,559 |
The College has the "right" mix of majors in current high-demand areas: 33% in Computer Science, 22% in Biology , and 10% in Technical Communication. This provides a good base to grow in the information and biotechnology areas.
The College is in the process of preparing and updating faculty and program profiles. Departmental details will be available for analysis, assessment, and comparison. The following quantitative and qualitative performance indicators are currently under consideration:
Quantitative Productivity Factors
| College | University | % | per t-t faculty S&A | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked Faculty (t-t) | 151 | 344 | 44 | ||
| Credit Hours (fiscal 98/99): | 4,461.5 | 11,067.5 | 40 | 29.5 | |
| SCH: | 83,810 | 176,093 | 48 | 555 | |
| Weighted SCH: | 135,166 | 316,744 | 43 | 895 | |
| All Faculty: | |||||
| Credit Hours | 7,029.8 | 14,912.6 | 47 | ||
| SCH: | 145,146 | 263,051 | 55 | ||
| Weighted SCH: | 212,686 | 436,082 | 48 | ||
| Bachelors Degrees: | 188 (1997-98) | 1.25 | |||
| MS Degrees: | 41 | 0.27 | |||
| PhD Degrees: | 20 | 0.13 | |||
| Research $: | $3 million | $20,000*) |
Quality Measures
| Publications: | 358 |         |     | 2.37 (per faculty) |
|---|
Other measures (in progress): Offices held in national professional societies, NSF career awards, prizes for scholarship/pedagogy from professional societies, editorial board memberships.
Other Visibility Factors and Special Areas with National Recognition
Numbers and numerical measures alone don't tell the whole story. Various departments within the College have exploited opportunities to establish national recognition in selected niches and these provide areas of basic strength on which we can build.
Biology faculty contributed to the establishment of Michigan Tech's tree biotechnology program, is engaged in cutting edge research in ore extraction through bacteria, and in multi-departmental environmental research. Biology also places 70% of applicants into medical schools (national average 38%). Chemistry faculty are known for the development and testing of new polymers for high-tech applications, lead a large-scale integrated scientific study of the Lake Superior ecosystem, and have an international reputation in the area of optical probes of chiral molecular and biomolecular structure. Computer Science conducts nationally recognized research in compilers - as demonstrated by federal funding and support by multiple industry partners (TI, HP, Compaq) - and in high-performance, parallel, and distributed computing. The Humanities department competes consistently with the best programs in the country - RPI, Purdue, Ohio State, Carnegie Mellon, Penn State - as one of the leading programs in technical communication, both on the undergraduate and graduate level. It produces and edits four international journals. Its Center for Computer-Assisted Language Instruction is nationally recognized as one of the oldest and consistently cutting edge centers for the use of electronic technology in educational environments. The department of Mathematical Sciences has assembled an internationally known group in discrete mathematics. At the same time, its faculty has received repeatedly state-wide recognition for its excellence in teaching. Physics faculty have leadership roles in the Pierre Auger Observatory (the world's largest cosmic ray observatory), the Astronomy Picture of the Day (25 million page hits per year), and in the design of instruments for major international collaborations as well as spacecraft payloads. The department of Social Sciences is considered the primary center for the graduate study of the sub-discipline of industrial archaeology in the US. It serves as the national headquarters for the Society of Industrial Archaeology and edits its journal.
Some of these examples rest heavily on a specific faculty member. We need to develop programs that are sustainable independent of individuals.
2.2. STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES, THREATS
Internal Strengths
Quality of faculty; quality of student body; science and technology niche; selected facilities; small enrollments in many junior and senior level courses and doctoral programs permitting close faculty-student interaction; potential to draw diverse gender and ethnic faculty and student body; rich environment for interdisciplinary work; location.
Internal Weaknesses
Low proportion of undergraduate majors in Sci&Arts; small alumni (and hence small donor) base and endowment; lack of diverse student and faculty body; small enrollments in many junior and senior level courses making course delivery expensive on a per student basis; small enrollments in doctoral programs; facilities.
External Opportunities
Enrollment growth in most majors; attract top transfer students into sciences and arts programs; science and technology key driving forces of the present and future; attractive niche for international students; internet.
External Threats
Engineering-school-only reputation impediment to recruitment; limited resource base and faculty lines; isolated geographic location; while MTU's tuition is low for an engineering school, it is not low for students who wish to study in traditional sciences and arts areas; funding base; internet; for-profit skills providers.
3. THE 2000 - 2010 PLAN IN SUPPORT OF THE UNIVERSITY GOALS
3.1 The University Goals
The University Plan, approved by the Board of Control, adopts the following six goals:
|
The University Plan also states, that "at any given time, one goal might require more immediate attention and focus. However, it is imperative that we make progress across all of the six goals."
In the following, it is shown how the objectives and strategies of the College of Sciences and Arts support the university goals and objectives. Specific action items for the next year(s) including measurable outcomes are given in the appendix
This current draft needs at least one more iteration to address the question of resource allocation and the link to the budget for the next year(s).
3.2 The Objectives and Strategies of the College of Sciences and Arts
To achieve the university goals requires FOCUS. The College distinguishes itself in two fundamental ways from the arts and sciences colleges at other institutions. First, we focus our curriculum, scholarship, and research on a technology and science niche that drives the content and the spirit of the College. Second, we weave our diverse disciplinary interests and strengths through this technology and science focus to create unique, innovative interdisciplinary programs that continually explore and, ultimately, expand the boundaries of learning for both students and faculty.
To build strong interdisciplinary programs requires a strong disciplinary core. Currently, the College of Sciences and Arts provides the essential core in mathematics, the sciences, the social sciences, the humanities, and the arts. While assessment might provide indication of relative under- or over-performance of individual programs, and, therefore, suggest some reallocation of resources, downsizing or elimination will not provide a major source of new resources. We already provide a smaller number of degree offerings than any other college in Michigan and, as a university, have the bare minimum number of PhD programs to qualify for Carnegie I.
The size of most of the disciplinary departments places limits on their ability to secure broad-based national recognition, i.e., recognition for the unit as opposed to outstanding individuals within the unit. Thus, meeting the goal of national recognition will require identifying and promoting programs that cross disciplines, drawing on strength of multiple departments in new ways.
GOAL 1: Provide an outstanding and relevant learning environment, consistent with a national university of choice.
The "traditional" general education areas including not only the Fine Arts, Social Sciences, and the Humanities, but also the mathematics and the sciences are clearly areas we must have.
Physical education and intramural programs will continue to provide a comprehensive package of opportunities for participation in sports activities and wellness concepts for students, faculty, and staff.
Areas to be de-emphasized: Always looking to the future, but continually aware of the past, we recognize the need to find a balance between the desire to produce web-based instruction and to maintain the personal contact with students that is so vital to a broad-based educational experience. Thus, we will continually reexamine our areas of emphasis related to web-based curricula to insure that we do not lose the intimate social experience we feel is key to our College's well being.
GOAL 2: Expand our scholarship and research activities, sustaining successful existing programs while pursuing new endeavors in carefully targeted areas.
| Biotech | InfoTech | Environment | Manufacturing | Materials | Disciplinary Core Knowledge/Expertise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bio | Molecular Biology Biochemistry | Generation of Biostructural Info | Ecological Research Aquatic/terrestrial Interactions | Automated Bioreactor | e.g. Botany, Physiology, Biochemistry | |
| Chem | Bio-organic Chem. Biomolecular modeling, Biosensors | Computational Chem. | Environ. Photochem., Environ. Analysis | Polymer Chem., Catalysis | Polymer thermosets | NMR, Spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, Organic synthesis |
| CS | Artificial Intelligence, parallel computation, high performance computing, software engineering, visualization, graphics and geometric computing can contribute to all 5 areas | |||||
| HU | Medical communication | Computer User Documentation Media design Usability testing | Risk communication Public information | e.g.,Ethics, Philosophy, Basic General Education, Scientific and technical Communication | ||
| Math | DNA mappings, Simulation tools | Design Theory, Coding Theory, Optical Codes | Statistics (contributes to all 5 areas) | Rheological Flow, Instabilities, Combustion simulation | Modeling composites | Discrete Math, Applied Math, Statistics |
| Phys | Biomodeling, Laser neuron guidance | Computational Quantum/ Statistical Physics | Atmospheric Physics, Hyperspectral Imaging, Remote Sensing, Image Processing | Nanomanufacturing, Laser particle guidance, Surface Physics | NMR/NQR, Comp. Modeling, Ferroelectric/ Magnetic materials | e.g. Astro, Atomic, Statistical, Computational physics |
| SS | Environmental Policy | Industrial history, General Education | ||||
| Biotech | InfoTech | Environment | Manufacturing | Materials | Disciplinary Core Knowledge/Expertise | |
GOAL 3: Identify the best size and blend for our educational programs, which have a diverse student body, faculty, and staff.
GOAL 4: Be the residential campus that provides a sense of diverse community and studentexperiences that develop the whole person.
GOAL 5: Provide an optimized administrative framework with sound physical, technological, and financial resources that are consistent with a national university of choice.
The university must also recognize that many of the older teaching and research laboratories are deteriorating, and the necessary funds to maintain or renovate the existing university physical plant must be secured.
GOAL 6: Support economic development, public sector outreach, and distance education appropriate for a technological university.
3.3 TIMELINE, RESOURCE ALLOCATION, MEASURABLE OUTCOMES
In the appendix, specific actions, time tables, and performance metrics for the next year(s) are given. The summary table below presents an estimate for the College profile in 2010 if these actions are successfully implemented.
Estimated Profile of the College of Sciences and Arts in 2010:
| Department | UG | MS | PhD | tt Fac | new ResFac | Res$(x1,000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biology | 350 | 20 | 25 | 15 | 4 | 1,500 |
| Chemistry | 100 | 15 | 45 | 20 | 2 | 1,000 |
| CS | 500 | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 2,500 |
| Edu | 5 | 500 | ||||
| FA | 20 | 10 | ||||
| HU | 150 | 20 | 50 | 32 | 100 | |
| Math | 100 | 20 | 20 | 32 | 1,000 | |
| Phys Ed | 2 | |||||
| Physics | 100 | 45 | 22 | 6 | 4,000 | |
| SS | 100 | 25 | 18 | 200 | ||
| Sci/Tech Plus | 230 | |||||
| College Total | 1650 | 140 | 215 | 176 | 22 | 10,800 |
4. ELEMENTS FOR SUCCESS
The College's ambitious goals reflect a vision for Michigan Tech in which we will develop and sustain nationally recognized undergraduate and graduate programs in our science and technology niches. Success in reaching these goals is based not only on the success of our own efforts within the College, but also on our success in forging and sustaining critical cross-institutional linkages. These cross-institutional, trans-portfolio links and planning iterations include recruiting and retention at all levels (undergraduate, graduate, faculty), our contributions to the success of the Capital Campaign, new strategies of Intellectual Property management and research support development, partnerships concerning infrastructure development, and alignment with broad institutional activities such as the proposed Technology Park. Indeed, success in becoming one of our nation's premier technological institutions within the top tier of research institutions will require not just the best efforts of MTU's individual units, but a coordinated strategy that combines all aspects of the university, our vision and accomplishments, our excellent faculty and students, and our resolve to succeed.
BENCHMARKS
Benchmark data are currently collected. NSF's WebCASPAR database ( http://caspar.nsf.gov/ ) provides access to a large body of statistical data resources dealing with science and engineering (S&E) at U.S. academic institutions and is being utilized..
Possible departmental benchmarks include (RPI emerged with the broadest base): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, University of Missouri Rolla, Colorado School of Mines; California Polytechnic State University, Carnegie Mellon, Clarkson University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Lehigh University.
Other possibilities are Case Western Reserve, University of Illinois, Purdue, New Jersey Institute of Technology, U. of Virginia, Cornell, Iowa State, U. of Minnesota, Texas Tech, and New Mexico State.
| MTU | RPI | Georgia Tech | Michigan State | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal support | 112 | 218 | 784 | 545 |
| Institutional support | 316(58 %) | 389(34 %) | 917(34 %) | 1,422(55 %) |
| Other outside support | 30 | 165 | 483 | 301 |
| Self Support | 83 | 375 | 507 | 311 |
| Total | 541 | 1,147 | 2,691 | 2,579 |
| [Teaching assistantships total | 150(28 %) | 280(24%) | 407(15%) | 822(32%)] |
| [Institutionally supported | 147 | 277 | 387 | 802 ] |
APPENDIX: Links to Departmental Portfolios
Army ROTC:
AirForce ROTC:
APPENDIX: Specific Actions, Performance Measures, and Time Table